| 17.4°C Dublin

US government given a week to offer up affidavit details on Donald Trump classified files raid

Close

Former US president Donald Trump wants details of the affidavit to be unsealed. Photo: AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File

Former US president Donald Trump wants details of the affidavit to be unsealed. Photo: AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File

Former US president Donald Trump wants details of the affidavit to be unsealed. Photo: AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File

A federal judge yesterday ordered the US Justice Department to put forward proposed redactions as he committed to making public at least part of the affidavit supporting the search warrant for Donald Trump’s estate in Florida.

US magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart gave prosecutors a week to submit a copy of the affidavit with proposed redactions for the information it wants to keep secret after the FBI seized classified and top-secret information during a search at Mr Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate last week.

The Justice Department also revealed during yesterday’s hearing that the investigation into whether the former US president illegally stored classified records at his Florida estate – and potentially violated the Espionage Act – is still “in its early stages”.

Jay Bratt, a top Justice Department national security prosecutor, had argued that the affidavit should remain hidden from the public.

Unsealing it, he said, would provide a “road map” of the investigation – which is in its “early stages” – and expose the next steps to be taken by federal agents and prosecutors.

He argued it was in the public interest for the investigation, including interviews of witnesses, to go forward unhindered.

As the hearing kicked off, a small caravan of vehicles with Trump flags drove past the federal courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida.

An attorney for Mr Trump, Christina Bobb, was in the courthouse on yesterday but said she was only there to observe the court proceeding.

Attorneys for several news organisations argued the affidavit’s release would help the public determine if the Justice Department had legitimate reasons for the search or if it was part of a Biden administration vendetta against Mr Trump, as the former president and his backers contend.

Mr Trump, in a Truth Social post last week, called for the release of the unredacted affidavit in the interest of transparency. “The matter is one of utmost public interest, involving the actions of current and former government officials,” wrote attorney Carol Jean LoCiero, who is representing the Times and other media.

Judge Reinhart gave the US government until next Thursday to submit its version with the proposed redactions. He said he would then review it and may meet lawyers for the government and give them a chance to make an argument for why specific information should be withheld.

Justice Department attorneys have argued that the investigation into Mr Trump’s handling of “highly classified material” is ongoing and the document contains sensitive information about witnesses.

Daily Digest Newsletter

Get ahead of the day with the morning headlines at 7.30am and Fionnán Sheahan's exclusive take on the day's news every afternoon, with our free daily newsletter.

This field is required

A recent filing by Juan Antonio Gonzalez, the US attorney in Miami, and Mr Bratt, a top US national security official, stated that making the affidavit public would “cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation”.

“If disclosed, the affidavit would serve as a road map to the government’s ongoing investigation, providing specific details about its direction and likely course, in a manner that is highly likely to compromise future investigative steps,” they wrote.

FBI agents searched Mr Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate on August 8, removing 11 sets of classified documents, with some not only marked “top secret” but also “sensitive compartmented information,” according to a receipt of what was taken that was released last Friday.

That is a special category meant to protect the nation’s most important secrets that if revealed publicly could cause “exceptionally grave” damage to US interests.


Related topics


Most Watched





Privacy