Thursday 19 September 2019

‘Faulty equipment and safety failures’ left pilots fighting to control jet

Based on the number of problems with the aircraft beforehand, investigators suggested the jet should not have been in service.

National Transportation Safety Committee investigator Nurcahyo Utomo during a press conference on the committee’s preliminary findings (Achmad Ibrahim/AP)
National Transportation Safety Committee investigator Nurcahyo Utomo during a press conference on the committee’s preliminary findings (Achmad Ibrahim/AP)

By Niniek Karmini and David Koenig, Associated Press

Faulty equipment and Indonesian carrier Lion Air’s own safety failures had pilots fighting for control of their Boeing 737 MAX 8 as it plunged into the Java Sea on October 28, killing all 189 people on board, investigators said Wednesday.

The investigators said they were still struggling to understand why the plane crashed, but they cited multiple factors centred on faulty sensors and an automatic safety system that repeatedly forced the plane’s nose down despite the pilots’ efforts to correct the problem.

Based on the number of problems with the aircraft beforehand, they suggested the jet should not have been in service.

The National Transportation Safety Commission’s Nurcahyo Utomo said investigators were trying to work out from interviews with engineers why they deemed the Boeing 737 airworthy.

“We need to compare the statements of the engineers with the required procedures,” Utomo said.

Once the jet was airborne, the pilots appeared to have been overwhelmed, said another of the crash investigators, Ony Suryo Wibowo.

“The problem is if multiple malfunctions occur all at once, which one should be prioritised?” Wibowo said.

ipanews_c2d32f72-437b-4676-b6ca-7309b5337042_embedded239397955
(PA Graphics)

The lack of the aircraft’s cockpit voice recorder, which is still missing, is a dire obstacle to resolving that mystery, the investigators said.

The report by Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Commission repeats earlier recommendations made just after the disaster that pilots be better versed in emergency procedures and aware of past aircraft problems.

The investigators recommended that Lion Air ensured it followed proper operating procedures to improve its “safety culture and to enable the pilot to make proper decisions” and that it ensured it kept proper, full documentation on flights and maintenance issues.

The MAX aircraft that crashed is the latest version of Boeing’s popular 737 jetliner.

Its new automated system pushes the nose down if a sensor detects that the nose is pointed so high that the plane could go into an aerodynamic stall.

ipanews_c2d32f72-437b-4676-b6ca-7309b5337042_embedded239920743
Members of the National Transportation Safety Committee lift a box containing the flight data recorder (Fauzy Chaniago/AP)

The sensor, called an angle-of-attack vane, or AOA, malfunctioned in earlier flights.

Pilots who flew the aircraft from Bali to Jakarta a day before the crash told investigators that the anti-stall system engaged due to erroneous airspeed and altitude indicators, but the flight crew managed to adjust the plane’s pitch manually by shutting the automated system off.

That enabled them to restore control and land safely.

It was unclear why the pilots on the failed flight from Jakarta to a regional airport the next day were unable to do the same, exactly what technicians did to try to fix the problems, and if there were other steps that should have been taken given that four of the crashed aircraft’s six previous flights had experienced technical problems.

“We need to find out what happened and why the pilots took different actions. That why we really want to have the cockpit voice recorder,” he said.

In a statement following the release of the report, Boeing played up the possibility of pilot error.

As our customers and their passengers continue to fly the 737 MAX to hundreds of destinations around the world every day, they have our assurance that the 737 MAX is as safe as any airplane that has ever flown the skies Boeing

“As our customers and their passengers continue to fly the 737 MAX to hundreds of destinations around the world every day, they have our assurance that the 737 MAX is as safe as any airplane that has ever flown the skies,” it said.

The aircraft manufacturer noted that the investigators’ report cited actions by the flight crew that led to the crash.

It also pointed to maintenance work and procedures that had failed to fix the aircraft’s repeated problems.

Peter Lemme, an expert in aviation and satellite communications and a former Boeing engineer who wrote an analysis of the data on his blog, likened the problems to “a deadly game of tag” in which the plane pointed down, the pilots countered by manually aiming the nose higher, only for the sequence to repeat about five seconds later.

That happened 26 times during the 11-minute flight, but pilots failed to recognise what was happening and follow the known procedure for countering incorrect activation of the automated safety system, Lemme told The Associated Press.

Lemme said he was troubled that there were not easy checks to see if sensor information was correct, that the crew of the fatal flight apparently was not warned about the problems on previous flights and that the Lion Air jet was not fully repaired after those flights.

“Had they fixed the airplane, we would not have had the accident,” he said.

“Every accident is a combination of events, so there is disappointment all around here,” he said.

The Indonesian investigation is continuing with help from US regulators and Boeing.

More than 200 MAX jets have been delivered to airlines around the world. Pilots at American Airlines and Southwest Airlines complained this month that they had not been given all information about the new automated anti-stall safety system on the MAX.

PA Media

Today's news headlines, directly to your inbox every morning.

Editors Choice

Also in World News