| 12.5°C Dublin

‘Russian agent’ conspiracy theories fuelled after five Ukrainian soldiers shot dead on base

Close

A Ukrainian soldier holds a light anti-tank weapon, supplied by Britain, in Lviv, Ukraine. Photo: Reuters

A Ukrainian soldier holds a light anti-tank weapon, supplied by Britain, in Lviv, Ukraine. Photo: Reuters

A Ukrainian soldier holds a light anti-tank weapon, supplied by Britain, in Lviv, Ukraine. Photo: Reuters

The shooting at the Makarov Yuzhny Machine-Building Plant in Dnipro, Ukraine, was shocking and lethal.

A young conscript had suddenly opened fire with his army issue AK-47 rifle, killing five soldiers and injuring five others.

The gunman, 21-year-old Artem Ryabchuk, fled. He was arrested a few hours later.

The motives for his actions were not clear, say the authorities.

The Indo Daily: Explainer - why is there tension between Ukraine and Russia, and what does it mean for Ireland?

Listen on Apple
Podcasts Listen on
Spotify

Ukraine’s deputy interior minister, Anton Gerashchenko, announced investigators would examine how the conscript passed a medical commission allowing him access to weapons.

However, there was immediate traffic on social media from people who had apparently seen “proof” that the young man was a Russian agent.

Some asserted this was the first mission in a murder campaign which will follow.

That kind of reaction on social media is perhaps unsurprising in the current uncertain and volatile scenario, with daily warnings of impending war.

But the narrative of a “hidden hand” sowing violence and discord, creating a “provocation”, has been very much present throughout the Maidan protests of 2014, the separatist war which followed, and the outbreaks of strife which have taken place subsequently.

American and British officials have held in the current confrontation that the Russians will stage “false flag” attacks to justify military action.

Daily Digest Newsletter

Get ahead of the day with the morning headlines at 7.30am and Fionnán Sheahan's exclusive take on the day's news every afternoon, with our free daily newsletter.

This field is required

This theme has now been turned around and taken up with gusto by the Russians – in some blogs, but also in the mainstream media.

The disinformation campaign has gained rapid traction.

Semyon Pegov, a blogger with 179,000 followers on the WarGonzo site, on the messaging service Telegram, has “revealed” 150 members of British Special Forces have arrived for action at Kramatorsk in the Donbas.

“British specialists arrived at the military airport about a week ago, local residents often see them in the city, the British do not hide their affiliation,” he said.

“We’ve received intelligence accounts that Ukraine is training special groups. There are six of them. The British are directly involved with them as instructors.”

The UK undercover troops were, he said, planning to sabotage social facilities and chemical plants in the separatist republics of Donetsk and Luhansk.

The operation would be somewhat convoluted. The British would carry out the attacks, according to an RT report, disguising themselves as Russian Spetznaz (Special Forces), film themselves, and then disseminate the footage while a separatist defector, in reality an actor, would tell the western media the Russians had carried out the “provocation”.

The tales of a British role in the clandestine conflict are perhaps, at least partly, due to British ministers, and parts of the media, repeatedly declaring that “British troops have been sent to the Ukraine”.

In reality, a small number of soldiers are here to train Ukrainian forces, including in the use of the 2,000 short-range missiles, NLAW (next generation light anti-tank weapon) which Britain has sent to Ukraine, something for which Ukrainians are grateful in their hour of need.

This, however, is not the only time that the role of “secret” UK forces have appeared in Ukraine’s conflict. One example from the past was six years ago, at the town of Andriivka, in the Donbas, when I was told with great certainty that British snipers had been at work against separatist fighters.

“The snipers on that hill were British. People have seen them. You could tell by their uniforms,” said a local man, Vitali Nelovich.

Incriminating evidence produced to prove British involvement was a combat jacket with a Union Jack on the sleeve, along with a panther’s head badge.

“What is this? How do you explain this?” demanded a separatist fighter.

The combat jacket had somehow, I suggested, ended up there after a long journey through army surplus stores.

The same combat jacket appeared later on a YouTube video. A man in balaclava displaying it exclaimed: “Look at this chevron, a white lion.”

Another man corrected him: “No, it’s a panther, an English panther.” The first man continued: “Yes, that’s right, English panthers; they are very close to the nationalists. They are very well trained. They came to kill us, but don’t worry, we will protect the public.” (© Independent News Service)


Most Watched





Privacy