New files show how UK officials covered up sex abuse by MPs
Former British Cabinet minister Leon Brittan has been named in top secret files uncovered following a review into historical child sex abuse in Westminster.
The documents also revealed that allegations about MPs were dismissed for fear of political embarrasment.
Peter Morrison, who was an aide to Margaret Thatcher, ex-diplomat Sir Peter Hayman and former minister William van Straubenzee are also mentioned in the documents released by the Home Office.
One of the files relating to Hayman was held by the British Cabinet Office but “overlooked” during a previous trawl for information.
Documents that refer to Straubenzee had been earmarked for destruction but National Archives officials flagged them up to the British government.
A group of papers that name Morrison, Brittan, Hayman and Straubenzee as well as contain references to the Kincora children’s home in Northern Ireland where boys were abused were “found in a separate Cabinet Office store of assorted and unstructured papers”.
The admission came after MPs left Westminster for the summer recess.
In a document published on the government’s website, the British Home Office said a fresh search of the archives had been carried out after a file emerged earlier this year that should have been submitted to the Wanless and Whittam inquiry into the handling of allegations that prominent figures were child abusers.
Peter Wanless, head of the National Society for the Prevention of cruelty to Children, and lawyer Richard Whittam reported last year that they had found no evidence that records were deliberately removed or destroyed.
After examining the latest batch of documents, they said they “found nothing to cause us to alter the conclusions drawn or recommendations made in our review”.
But they warned that the emergence of papers after the review had been completed was not “helpful” in giving the public confidence in the process.
The documents also revealed that allegations about an MP with a “penchant for small boys” were dismissed on the basis of his word with the potential political fallout the top priority rather than the risk to children.
Their report said: “There were a number of references across the papers we saw that reinforced the observation we made in our review that issues of crimes against children, particularly the rights of the complainant, were given considerably less serious consideration than would be expected today.
“To give one striking example, in response to claims from two sources that a named Member of Parliament ‘has a penchant for small boys’, matters conclude with acceptance of his word that he does not and the observation that ‘at the present stage ... the risks of political embarrassment to the Government is rather greater than the security danger’. The risk to children is not considered at all.”
Mr Wanless and Mr Whittam said the latest discovery showed the need for a broader search of documents.