Ireland and the UK is under pressure take in more refugees after the image of a dead Syrian toddler washed up on a Turkish beach raised the emotional temperature of the debate.
British Prime Minister David Cameron was widely criticised for saying on Wednesday that he did not think the answer was to take more and more refugees but to bring peace and stability to the Middle East, hours before the harrowing image emerged.
His comments echo those of Irish Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform Brendan Howlin who said this morning taking in people was not a long-term solution.
He told RTÉ’s Morning Ireland: "This is not simply a European issue... it's a world issue. Some of the difficulties dislodging people from their homelands in Syria and Iraq were not caused by Europeans.
“We need to have a world response with a real sense of solidarity and humanity and Ireland will certainly measure up to what was asked of us"
Mr Howlin, who indicated Ireland would likely take in more than its allocated quota of 600 people, made his comments as the UK as come under intense pressure to soften its stance on taking in more refugees crossing into Europe from Syria.
The change of tone from a newspaper criticised by the United Nations rights chief in April after one of its columnists compared migrants to "cockroaches", was a mark of the emotional impact of the images of human suffering across Europe.
"We are nothing without compassion. Pic should make us all ashamed. We have failed in Syria. I am sorry little angel, RIP," wrote Nadhim Zahawi, a member of parliament from Cameron's Conservative Party, on Twitter, above a picture of the Syrian boy.
Some other Conservative legislators also spoke out in favour of a more compassionate stance.
Since the start of the Syrian war, Britain has taken in 216 people under a UN-backed relocation scheme for vulnerable Syrians, and about 5,000 Syrian refugees who were able to reach Britain by their own means.
The government says that while Britain has taken in fewer refugees than other European countries, it is the most generous donor of aid money to humanitarian organisations helping Syrians in their own country and in refugee camps in the Middle East.
But a growing chorus of critics has dismissed that response as inadequate in the face of the unfolding tragedy.
David Miliband, a former Labour foreign secretary who now runs the International Rescue Committee, a non-governmental organisation, said he refused to believe that Britain had reached the limit of its capacity to take in refugees.
In a sign of growing grassroots disquiet with the official stance, a plan to stage a march next week through central London to Cameron's Downing Street office to show solidarity with refugees was gaining traction on Facebook.
A petition on parliament's website to accept more refugees and increase support for them had garnered close to 100,000 signatures.
For more than three decades, Ireland was happy to modernise an outdated national infrastructure with EU money and support. However, the minute we were due to become net contributors to the European project, we began to question our position through a series of referendums - to the point of repeating them until we managed to get the right answer.