Comment: Video of police interview gave glimpse of cardinal's infamous 'fiery' temper
Cardinal George Pell once blamed his wooden public persona on the self-discipline required to contain "a formidable temper".
That anger bubbled through the former Vatican finance minister's composure as he was interviewed by Australian police in a conference room at the Hilton Airport Hotel in Rome on October 19, 2016.
Detective Sgt Chris Reed for the first time detailed to Pell allegations that he had orally raped two choirboys in Melbourne's St Patrick's Cathedral while he was archbishop of Australia's second-largest city 20 years earlier.
Pell appeared incredulous, distressed and outraged. He grimaced and waved his arms over his head, crossed them tightly across his chest and muttered to himself as the detectives detailed the accusations that one of the alleged victims levelled against him a year earlier.
Pell's lawyer Michael do Rozario, a Sydney law firm partner, sat beside him and remained largely silent throughout the interview, 45 minutes of which was shown to the jury in the final week of Pell's trial and retrial.
Pell, the most senior Catholic cleric ever charged with child sex abuse, was convicted in December, but the court had until yesterday forbidden publication of any details about the trial. He faces a potential 50-year prison term.
"The allegations involve vile and disgusting conduct contrary to everything I hold dear and contrary to the explicit teachings of the Church which I have spent my life representing," Pell read from a statement early in the police interview in response to a summary of the allegations presented by detectives to his lawyers in advance.
During the trial, Det Sgt Reed told the jury that he had never before presented a suspect with such a summary of the allegations before a recorded interview.
But the summary was one of the demands made by Pell's lawyers before Pell would agree to be interviewed in Rome, where Australian police have no jurisdiction and Australia has no extradition treaty.
On the allegation that he had cornered two 13-year-old boys in a back room of the cathedral and exposed an erect penis from his robes, Pell responded: "Oh, stop it. What a load of absolutely disgraceful rubbish. It's completely false. Madness."
On the accusation that he knelt masturbating while fondling one of the boy's bare genitals, the cardinal responded: "After Sunday Mass? Well, need I say any more? What a load of garbage and falsehood and deranged falsehood."
Pell warned the police that if he were charged on allegations that he described as "products of fantasy" and "fundamentally improbable," the reputational damage would be done before any verdict.
"Immeasurable damage will be done to me and the Church by the mere laying of charges which on proper examination were later found to be untrue," Pell said.
Some aspects of the interview appeared to take Pell and his lawyers by surprise. The summary referred to the crimes allegedly occurring "after choir". The lawyers misunderstood that to mean after choir practice, which took place midweek in an empty cathedral. In fact, police meant the abuse had taken place after the 60 choristers had sung at the so-called Solemn Mass, at 11am every Sunday. On clarifying that the crimes allegedly occurred in a sacristy after Mass, Pell told police: "That's good for me because it makes it even more fantastical."
"The sacristy after Mass is generally a hive of activity," Pell said. "You could scarcely imagine a place that was more unlikely to be [the scene of] committing paedophilia crimes than the sacristy of the cathedral after Mass."
Because Pell chose not to take the witness stand, the police interview was the jury's only glimpse of the defendant's personal reaction to the crisis that was enveloping him.
Apart from saying "Not guilty" in a firm and defiant voice when five charges were read at the outset of the trial, Pell remained silent.
He made an unusual show of respect by standing for the jury as it entered and left the court during the first trial, which ended in a deadlocked jury in September.
He was frailer by the second trial in November and December, using a crutch because he required two surgical knee replacements. He did not stand for the jury.
Pell said in an Australian television interview weeks before his interview with police that the public perception of him as "wooden" was wrong.
Standing a solidly built 6ft 4ins with a reputation for never flinching from conflict, Pell has been a powerful presence both physically and in personality.
He was offered a contract to play professional Australian Rules Football, but chose the seminary instead.
"I wasn't a bad footballer. I was very fiery," Pell said. "I've got a formidable temper which I almost never show, but the discipline that is needed by me not to lapse in that way I think helps explain my wooden appearance."