Saturday 20 January 2018

US bombers and flighter jets buzz North Korean coast as Pyongyang says missiles aimed at US mainland are 'inevitable'

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Photo: Reuters
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Photo: Reuters

Kim Tong-hyun in Seoul

North Korea said yesterday that firing its rockets at the US mainland was "inevitable", in a further escalation of rhetoric between the leaders of the two countries.

North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho's remarks before the UN General Assembly came hours after US Air Force B-1B Lancer bombers escorted by F-15C Eagle fighter escorts flew in international airspace over waters east of North Korea in a show of force the Pentagon said demonstrated the range of military options available to Donald Trump.

The flight, which was disclosed shortly before North Korea's foreign minister was due to address the UN, was the farthest north of the demilitarized zone separating North and South Korea that any US fighter jet or bomber has flown in the 21st century, the Pentagon said.

"This mission is a demonstration of US resolve and a clear message that the President has many military options to defeat any threat," said Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White, calling North Korea's weapons program "a grave threat."

"We are prepared to use the full range of military capabilities to defend the U.S. homeland and our allies."

The US move came after North Korea's foreign minister boasted his country may test a hydrogen bomb in the Pacific Ocean. The world hasn't seen an above-ground, atmospheric nuclear test since an inland detonation by China in 1980.

North Korea's room for error would be minimal, and any mistake could be disastrous. Even if successful, such a test could endanger air and sea traffic in the region. Because of that, many experts don't think North Korea would take such a risk. But they're also not ruling it out, given the North's increasing number of nuclear and missile tests.

The main reason for North Korea to take that risk would be to contradict outside doubts about whether it really has a thermonuclear weapon small enough to fit on a missile, said Jeffrey Lewis, a US arms control expert at the Middlebury Centre of International Studies at Monterey.

So far, North Korea has been separately testing nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles built to deliver them, rather than testing them both together.

North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho would not have spoken without approval from Pyongyang's top leadership when he suggested to reporters in New York on Friday that the country could conduct an atmospheric hydrogen bomb test. Hours earlier, the country's leader, Kim Jong Un, in an unusual direct statement to the world, pledged to take "highest-level" action against the United States over President Donald Trump's threat to "totally destroy" the North if provoked. Ri did not elaborate and said no one knew what decision Kim would make.

If North Korea attempts an atmospheric nuclear test at sea, it would probably involve its most powerful ballistic missiles, such as the intermediate-range Hwasong-12 or the intercontinental-range Hwasong-14, experts say. The country lacks assets to air-drop a nuclear device, and sending a vessel out to sea to detonate a device raises the chances of being detected and stopped by the US military.

For the nuclear missile to reach a remote part of the Pacific, it would have to fly over Japan, as the North did with two Hwasong-12 test launches in recent weeks.

There have only been a handful of times when atmospheric nuclear tests involved ballistic missiles, including China's fourth nuclear test in 1966. That involved a midrange Dongfeng-2 missile being launched from a deep inland rocket facility to the Lop Nur nuclear test site in the country's far west.

Lewis finds similarities between the current situation surrounding North Korea and the events that led to China's 1966 test, which was driven by US doubts of Chinese capabilities to place nuclear weapons on ballistic missiles. "The United States is still taking an attitude of scepticism towards North Korea's nuclear capabilities," Lewis said. "The difference, of course, is that China fired its nuclear-armed missile over its own territory, not another country."

A nuclear launch by North Korea would come dangerously close to an act of war, said Lee Choon Geun, a missile expert from South Korea's Science and Technology Policy Institute. Missile tests can easily go wrong and the consequences of failure could be terrifying if the missile is armed with a nuclear weapon.

A failed flight or an accidental detonation over Japan would most likely trigger retaliation from Washington and Tokyo that might result in a nuclear war, Lee said.

"It's reasonable to think that Ri was bluffing," Lee said. "Would they be sure that the United States and Japan will just sit there and watch?"

But Lewis said that's exactly what the US and Japan would do. "Though I am sure such a launch would be very alarming to people in Japan, there is little the US or Japan could do," he said. "Would we really start a war over such an act? I don't think so."

An atmospheric nuclear test would be far more dangerous than detonations in controlled underground environments, both because of the force of the blast and unrestrained release of radioactive materials that could spread out over large areas. Such a launch would potentially endanger aircraft and ships because it's highly unlikely the North would give prior warnings or send naval vessels to the area to control sea traffic.

An atmospheric thermonuclear blast would also raise the risk of damage caused by an electromagnetic pulse, an intense wave of electrical energy generated by the explosion that could destroy electronic devices and equipment over a vast area, Lee said.

The US and the former Soviet Union combined to conduct more than 400 atmospheric nuclear tests before they and Britain signed a 1963 treaty banning tests in the atmosphere, outer space and underwater. The treaty was later signed by more than 100 other countries. China conducted 22 atmospheric nuclear tests, which frequently involved bombers dropping nuclear devices on test sites, before its last one in 1980.

While the impact of previous tests hasn't been fully understood, damage from radioactive fallout could be serious. When the US detonated its most powerful nuclear device in a 1954 test code-named Castle Bravo, the radioactive fallout spread far beyond the test site in the Marshall Islands. Some 23 crew members of a Japanese fishing vessel that was 160km east of the detonation site were contaminated and suffered from radiation sickness. One of the fishermen, Matashichi Oishi, said he saw a flash before tiny white flakes fell on the crew members like snow.

In the last few months, North Korea has been stepping up the aggressiveness of its nuclear and missile tests.

The North conducted its sixth and most powerful nuclear test on September 3 in what it said was the detonation of a thermonuclear weapon built for its developmental Hwasong-14 ICBMs. In two July flight tests, those missiles displayed the potential ability to reach deep into the US.

With its two Hwasong-12 launches over Japan in August and September, the North also broke from its previous test regime of firing missiles at highly lofted angles to reduce range and avoid other countries. The launches were seen as North Korea's attempts to win more military space in a region dominated by its enemies and evaluate the reliability of its missiles under operational conditions.

Kim Dong-yub, a former top South Korean military official, said it is more likely the North's next significant launch would be a full-range test of an unarmed Hwasong-14 ICBM. The North could launch a missile 7,000km to display a capability to reach Hawaii or Alaska, he said.

However he added that recent events teach us not to underestimate the North.

©Reuters

Reuters

Promoted Links

Today's news headlines, directly to your inbox every morning.

Promoted Links

Editors Choice

Also in World News