No goals, no spark, no excuses - Alexis Sanchez is simply not justifying his huge salary
It was exactly eight months on Saturday since Manchester United announced the arrival of Alexis Sanchez from Arsenal with a theatricality that tends to accompany their new unveilings these days.
The Chile striker was filmed playing 'Glory, Glory Man United' on the piano, with Ed Woodward, the club's executive vice-chairman, gleefully divulging to investors a fortnight later that the Twitter video and assorted fanfare generated 75 per cent more social media interactions than Neymar's world record £198 million move to Paris Saint-Germain.
Presumably, United felt a piano was the appropriate accompaniment for a player who would soon have the team's attack dancing to his tune but the only sound emanating from Old Trafford at the weekend, after a 1-1 draw with Wolverhampton Wanderers, were groans of frustration as Sanchez hit yet another bum note.
Off the field, he may be a record-breaker but, on it, shirt sales count for nothing and, as supporters filed out of the ground debating where Sanchez ranks in that rather long list of transfer disappointments in the post-Alex Ferguson era, it seemed fair to wonder if the forward's troubles have developed into something more serious than simply a sustained slump.
Chris Smalling has scored three times since Sanchez last found the net in the Premier League for United, a drought that now extends to 829 minutes.
Since Sanchez scored the first of his paltry three goals for United on January 26, Mohamed Salah has plundered 23 goals for Liverpool, Sadio Mane 15, Eden Hazard has 10 goals for Chelsea in that time and Raheem Sterling eight for Manchester City.
Yet Sanchez's shortcomings cannot be quantified solely by the dearth of goals. It is the absence of any discernible spark that is most alarming. Indeed, the Sanchez script has become a wearily familiar one: if he is not squandering possession cheaply, he is invariably seen burrowing forward, head down, into an opposition roadblock, the worst kind of single-mindedness in a team yearning for collective fluidity. His highlights reel makes for decidedly slim pickings. Is that all £500,000 a week buys you, really?
There were plenty of occasions last season when Mourinho kept Sanchez on the pitch by virtue, it seemed, of him being his latest expensive recruit, despite many of his performances warranting an early shower. But even the United manager appears to have given up that pretence now.
Having been dropped for the Champions League tie against Young Boys on Wednesday after an underwhelming showing in the win at Watford, Sanchez was substituted for the third successive Premier League match on Saturday and, as was the case at Turf Moor against Burnley, he lasted barely an hour against Wolves.
So what is Sanchez's excuse? For the first time in nine years, he had a full, uninterrupted pre-season. During the last international break, Chile accepted a request from United for the player to stay in Manchester and sit out his country's friendly against South Korea. Fatigue cannot be cited as a factor.
Moreover, Sanchez is 29, with four years of experience playing in the Premier League. He was supposed to represent a quick fix. He is not a 19-year-old finding his feet in a new country, even if he has had to adapt to a new way of playing under Mourinho having previously been immersed in Arsene Wenger's system at Arsenal.
The trouble for United is the ramifications extend beyond Sanchez's own dismal form. Given the pressing need for a fast, skilful right winger, United's decision to move for Sanchez was odd in the sense that they already had two forwards who, like him, favoured playing off the left when not deployed centrally.
Neither Anthony Martial nor Marcus Rashford have benefitted from Sanchez's arrival and Mourinho now has a situation where he is struggling to get a tune out of any of them.
To compound matters, Sanchez's exorbitant salary is only likely to increase the wage demands of future transfer targets, not to mention existing squad members, who may rightly wonder how a player who is performing so poorly, so regularly can be paid what he is. (© Daily Telegraph, London)