Thursday 22 March 2018

Moyes fiasco means Fergie can no longer be kingmaker

David Moyes was unexpectedly handed the manager's job by Alex Ferguson (Photo credit IAN KINGTON/AFP/Getty Images)
David Moyes was unexpectedly handed the manager's job by Alex Ferguson (Photo credit IAN KINGTON/AFP/Getty Images)
James Lawton

James Lawton

With his fingerprints all over both the hiring and the firing of his humiliated protégé David Moyes, Alex Ferguson is now inviting the most unflattering question ever placed against his extraordinary career.

Why, it asks, is he lingering at the scene of the crime?

Today he meets Manchester United's appalled American owners in the company of his most faithful supporter and club director Bobby Charlton and chief executive Ed Woodward and, being Ferguson, he is expected to make an unabashed contribution to the debate over the claims of leading contenders Louis van Gaal and Carlo Ancelotti.

After the Moyes fiasco, and his clumsy but inevitable sacking, some thought the most successful manager in the history of British football might be inclined to seek the shadows, at least until normal United service resumed.

But they didn't know Ferguson – nor the depth of his belief that he still knows best about the club he returned to the pinnacle of English football a year ago with a squad widely seen as unfit for purpose.

There was disbelief last spring when an ageing team rode the goals of inspired signing Robin van Persie to an 11-point league triumph.

It was from that position of strength – some say a final statement of competitive genius – that Ferguson elected his successor and rode off into the sunset.

Unfortunately, he rode only as far as the publicity blitz that helped rocket his second autobiography to record-breaking sales – and a much photographed vantage point behind Moyes' embattled dugout.

It seemed, right from the start, much less a show of moral support as a glowering rebuke.

The mere presence of Ferguson, the ultimate winner, seemed only to compound the discomfort of a man of considerable achievement floundering in a new and increasingly hostile environment.

When the bruised Moyes issued a farewell statement this week, he did not exclude his erstwhile backer from those who had earned his gratitude in his months of trial, as he did pointedly the Old Trafford hierarchy and the players who had performed so abjectly for him.

If Ferguson retains much of his old influence at Old Trafford, it is despite and not because of his role in the Moyes denouement.

Indeed, if the egocentric Van Gaal or the more gently mannered Ancelotti is appointed, both would be likely to make the point that Ferguson's proper role is to retire gracefully into the shadows.

They will insist on the Van Gaal or the Ancelotti show rather than more Ferguson influence.

The latter seemed very much the case as Moyes tried unavailingly to stamp his presence and, as the drama unfolded so grimly, some long-time Old Trafford watchers were carried back more than 40 years to the troubled days that followed the retirement of the great Matt Busby.


The trauma of Moyes in many ways mirrored the agony of Wilf McGuinness, the young coach, and notably determined United player before he was struck down by injury, who was overwhelmed when Busby handed him the baton. McGuinness fell quickly and the shock of his experience turned his hair white overnight.

Moyes has not suffered such a fate – at least not yet – but he probably can identify easily enough with the man who succeeded McGuinness, Frank O'Farrell.

O'Farrell, like Moyes, came to Old Trafford with an impressive reputation but he too felt the weight of a hugely successful predecessor. He complained that Busby's presence in an office down the corridor from his own radiated into every corner of the club's affairs – and that nag must also have been felt by Moyes.

Comparisons between the experiences of Moyes and O'Farrell are uncanny. The latter was deeply disillusioned by the apparent unwillingness of senior players to respond to a new regime.

They appeared to be rooted in the days of Busby, which included the club's first European Cup win three years earlier, and O'Farrell complained bitterly that his influence was undermined by Busby's habit of playing an occasional round of golf with some of his old players.

When he was fired, 18 months into the job, O'Farrell, like Moyes, had three years to run on his contract. When he was summoned to the boardroom for a special meeting, he remarked to coach John Aston, "Well, at least it's a nice day for an execution."

Moyes, of course, died on the internet, a point he made angrily when told of his sacking by Woodward the day after news had reached every corner of the game.

None of this is likely to obscure Ferguson's extraordinary contribution to the club which was vulnerable to a £13m takeover bid soon after he arrived but which quickly he returned to all of its glory and financial strength.

Down the years his success brought an omnipotence that left him secure from the foibles of owners and directors, at least after his survival of an ill-judged war with chief shareholders John Magnier and JP McManus.

Many believe his last title was his most stunning achievement and that if the Moyes appointment brought him any benefit it was to underline his capacity to draw from his players all of their potential.

However, it is hard not believe that Ferguson's disastrous support of Moyes will now cloud any fresh attempt by him to become the kingmaker of Old Trafford.

He said his fellow Glaswegian was a man in his own image. He was tough and knowing and had a fine set of football values. Of course United listened. At the very least, they may be a little harder of hearing at their war council today.

Irish Independent

Sport Newsletter

The best sport action straight to your inbox every morning.

Editor's Choice

Also in Sport