Ozil struggles to make impact on big stage
There will be those who will have thought "pots and kettle" when Charlie Nicholas said, before this tie, that it was time for Mesut Ozil to deliver in a big game. But Nicholas was right, and he should know.
Before he forged a second career as a regular on Sky's Soccer Saturday Nicholas was a footballer, a pretty good one too. When he left Celtic for Arsenal in 1983 the hype and expectation were just as big as greeted Ozil's switch from Real Madrid to north London last season.
Nicholas cost only £650,000, Ozil £42.5m, but that is football inflation for you. Nicholas had turned down both Liverpool and Manchester United to sign for Arsenal and was spoken of as "the best young player to be produced in the British Isles since George Best".
No one has ever lived up to that claim and Nicholas was no exception. Indeed, bedevilled by inconsistency and distracted by London's nightlife, he was closer to the new Peter Marinello than the new Best. After fewer than five seasons at Highbury he was back in Scotland, at Aberdeen, his lifestyle at odds with George Graham's puritan outlook. Nicholas did, though, deliver in big games.
He did well against Tottenham, including a St Stephen's Day double at White Hart Lane. He also scored both goals in the 1987 League Cup final victory over Liverpool which earned Arsenal their first trophy in eight years and launched Graham's highly successful reign.
Ozil, however, has not. He was substituted in last year's FA Cup final, albeit in extra time, and in what was personally his biggest Arsenal game to date, last year's round of 16 tie at home to Bayern Munich, a missed penalty seemed to hit him so badly he took weeks to recover.
Injuries have not helped - tap "Ozil" into Google and "Ozil injury" is the search engine's first suggestion. This season he began late, after the World Cup, then suffered a knee injury which kept him out for more than three months.
Last night was only his 12th appearance of the season.
Since returning at Villa Park he has shown some good touches, including two goals, but last night he was awful. Not that he was alone. After four seasons in which they had been paired with - and lost to - Barcelona, Milan and Bayern Munich (twice) in the last 16 Arsenal had got lucky with Monaco, or so it seemed, especially as the team which won group D, Borussia Dortmund, were handed a tricky tie with Juventus. However, being favourites did not sit well with the Gunners.
Perhaps lured into a false sense of superiority by a bright opening in which Danny Welbeck twice threatened, they seemed to believe the tie would fall into their laps and the intensity dropped.
Even during that misleading start it was Kieran Gibbs, Santi Cazorla, Alexis Sanchez, even Francis Coquelin who created the chances, not Ozil. He was in his favoured No 10 role, and found good space between the lines but he conceded possession cheaply.
Creative players often lose the ball as they are playing high-risk, high-reward passes, but Ozil gave the ball away playing moderate-risk passes. Anonymous in the opening period, his first chance to open up Monaco's defence came in the 22nd minute when he received the ball in space with Arsenal breaking.
The pass to release Sanchez was a simple one for a player of Ozil's quality but it was underhit and Almamy Toure intercepted. Five minutes later he took a short pass from Gibbs into the box, turned into two defenders and was dispossessed.
His body language was already questionable, with his arms being raised in frustration when he did not receive a pass. Even an encouraging pat on the back from Cazorla did not lift his mood, with more arm-waving as another attack broke down. Having then given the ball to Wallace when trying to filter a pass through on the edge of the box, he finally set up Sanchez only for the Chilean to shoot just over.
At this stage there was no need to panic. But then Monaco scored, not once, but twice. Arsenal were suddenly inhabiting a nightmare. What can be said in Ozil's favour is that he never hid. He kept taking up good positions and demanding the ball. Maybe that was why Wenger kept faith with him as he shuffled his pack from the bench.
But players can take on too much responsibility. Ozil began dribbling at Monaco's bank of defenders and, unsurprisingly since that is not his strength, he always had the ball stolen. Ultimately he again disappeared from view.
Is it unfair to single out Ozil? He did not set his fee, a record for a German footballer as well as for Arsenal, and it may have been inflated by Arsenal's desperate need to make a marquee signing, but a £42.5m player is supposed to bend matches to his will, to shape and seize them.
Maybe Ozil is not that kind of player, notwithstanding his twin demolitions of England's senior and Under-21 teams in Bloemfontein and Malmo five and six summers ago. Arsenal, though, needed that kind of player last night. And they will need that kind of player in Monte Carlo on March 17. With other midfielders returning to fitness, will Wenger keep the faith? (© Independent News Service)