Reason to tackle Mr Quinn's tripe
I read the David Quinn article (Irish Independent, March 17) but decided not to respond. I thought (wrongly) that his argument would be clearly labelled as the religiously apologetic tripe that it is and that many people would respond as such.
To my bewilderment, I just read a follow-up letter that was in agreement with his nonsense argument, from Gary Kelly in Dublin.
The first question was: "Should we apply the same standards to everyone, whether a religious or lay person, who covered up child abuse, even if it is 35 years later?"