r Biden said that if Russia attacks any of those Eastern European states, the US would invoke Article 5 of the Nato charter.
The response would be as if Nato had been directly attacked.
“It’s absolutely clear: Article 5 is a sacred commitment the United States has made,” he stressed.
Strong words, a day after Putin said he was pulling out of the only remaining nuclear treaty Russia has with the US.
The move underscores how much distance has developed between Moscow and Washington one year after the invasion.
Mr Biden also met with Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg, who said “President Putin is not preparing for peace. On the contrary, he is preparing for war.
“So we must sustain and step up our support for Ukraine. We must give Ukraine what they need to prevail. We cannot allow Russia to continue to chip away at European security. We must break the cycle of Russian aggression.”
But even as Nato closed ranks, Russia, too, was strengthening ties, with China’s top diplomat, Wang Yi, who was in Russia for a meeting with Putin.
“Moscow and Beijing are ready to defend each other’s interests,” Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said.
Putin’s aggression is pushing the world closer to further confrontation. In attacking Ukraine, he has attacked Europe and threatened the global order. He has miscalculated at every important step. As a consequence, he has lost stature as a leader,and he has also damaged the status of Russia as a global power.
By contrast, the country he pledged to wipe off the map has won the admiration of the world.
But none of this ought to distract from the fact that the conflict has come to its most dangerous juncture. Putin has it within his power to either end it, or escalate it.
His disregard for global security suggests it is wiser to prepare for the latter insomuch as this is possible. He has repeatedly threatened to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield.
All he has done, to date, reflects his deepening contempt for rules-based democracy.
So far, China has reined itself in, offering only rhetorical support to Moscow. Beijing has always bridled at not getting the respect it deserves as a world power. So it can either begin supplying weapons to Russia, accelerating the prospect of matters spiralling out of control – or, it can exert its influence positively, to defuse the situation and burnish its diplomatic credentials, reaping the rewards.
The choice is simple: press for peace or fan the flames of war? Morally and ethically, the former is the only humane course.