Letting Donald Trump off the hook would be an act of banana republicanism

The closest the US justice department’s prosecutorial guidelines come to that concept is the requirement that a prosecution serve a “substantial federal interest”. But that factor, as properly understood, weighs in favour of prosecution. As the guidelines note: “One factor (when considering prosecution) that is obviously of primary importance is the actual or potential impact of the offence on the community and on the victim(s). The nature and seriousness of the offence may also include a consideration of national security interests.”

Well, there could hardly be a more substantial interest than punishing the leader of an attempt to overthrow a democratic election to deter future coups.

Fortunately, Garland made clear in a recent interview with NBC News’s Lester Holt that his department intends to “hold everyone, anyone who was criminally responsible for the events surrounding January 6, for any attempt to interfere with the lawful transfer of power from one administration to another, accountable”.

He seemed to reject the idea of excluding a prosecution simply because Trump was president.

Second, prosecuting a former political leader is not what will turn the US into a “banana republic.”

Indeed, I have some unfortunate news for the nervous Nellies: the country is already on its way to becoming a failed democracy. The question is now what we intend to do about it.

How do you know democracy is unravelling? It is when an incumbent does these sorts of things:

⬤ Refuses to acknowledge he lost an election.

⬤ Uses captive media outlets to undermine the sanctity of elections and lie about election “fraud”.

⬤ Ignores mounds of evidence showing the election was legitimate.

⬤ Attempts to use the US justice department to throw doubt on the legitimacy of an election.

⬤ Pressurises state officials to “find” just enough votes to change the result of a key state.

⬤ Pressurises state officials to retract voting certificates and create fraudulent documents to override the will of the people.

⬤ Cooks up a scheme to retain power that his own counsel understands would be illegal.

⬤ Pressurises his vice president to disregard his oath and help facilitate the coup plot.

⬤ Calls angry people to show up at the nation’s capital just when the legislature is counting electoral votes and promises the gathering will be “wild!”.

⬤ Invites an armed, unhinged mob to march on Congress and promises to join them in confronting the elected leaders carrying out their constitutional duties.

⬤ Incites the crowd to hold his vice-president responsible for not having the “courage” to overturn an election, even as the violent mob moves in on him.

⬤ Refuses to use law enforcement or national security personnel to put down his supporters’ violent insurrection.

By now, Americans should realise that this was the stuff of tin-pot dictatorships, not mature constitutional democracies.

They should understand that the Republican Party, filled with small individuals hiding behind phony claims of privilege to avoid testifying, has become the bullying apparatus that dictators have historically used to amplify their lies and cloak their actions in legitimacy.

If Americans don’t want violence to become a standard political weapon, they should demand that Garland keep his word.

This is not the call to “lock him up”. This is the call of a citizenry demanding that the US justice department follow the legal process to hold responsible anyone involved in arguably the worst crime against democracy in US history. Only a “banana republic” would give the guy behind the coup attempt a get-out-of-jail card.