Wednesday 13 December 2017

Conscience clause could be used as a licence to discriminate against others

'Extending rights to others doesn’t dilute your own'
'Extending rights to others doesn’t dilute your own'
Martina Devlin

Martina Devlin

A conscience clause sounds so virtuous. So ethical. So upright. In fact, a group of people whose religious convictions have led them to lobby for wriggle-out rights to recognising same-sex marriage is asking for a narrow-minded clause. A prejudice clause. A bigotry clause.

Such a caveat undermines the principle of going to the people. Let the one-citizen, one-vote rule decide whether or not same-sex marriage should be legalised in Ireland - but give no special interest group a State-backed right to ignore the will of the majority.

Everyone's vote in the marriage equality referendum must carry equal weight, and we must all respect the result whether or not we happen to agree with the decision. Otherwise, democracy is compromised.

Please sign in or register with for free access to Opinions.

Sign In

Promoted Links

Today's news headlines, directly to your inbox every morning.

Don't Miss