Monday 10 December 2018

It's telling that we excuse Islam's 'aberrations', but not the Church's

A young girl leaves a message of support on the base of the obelisk on London Bridge following the terror attack in which eight people died. Photo: PA
A young girl leaves a message of support on the base of the obelisk on London Bridge following the terror attack in which eight people died. Photo: PA

David Quinn

It is time to put the Catholic Church "in the dustbin, where it belongs", left-wing TD Bríd Smith announced in the Dáil last week. There are strong echoes here of former US president Ronald Reagan, who once memorably said communism belonged in the dustbin of history.

There was barely a murmur of protest in response to Ms Smith's statement. Approached by 'The Irish Catholic' newspaper, Micheál Martin said it was an example of "intolerant populism". It was at least that. If Ms Smith had said it was time to put Islam "in the dustbin where it belongs", the denunciation of her fellow politicians, and the commentariat generally, would be ringing in her ears. She would be asked on to radio shows to defend herself against her accusers.

But she would never say such a thing about Islam, and it would not be out of fear of retaliation by a jihadist. It would be out of concern for the Muslim community as a minority. Catholicism is not considered a minority even in countries like Britain where Catholics are in a minority. It is considered fair game (as is Christianity) for every kind of attack, no matter how extreme, whereas almost any criticism of Islam is condemned as 'Islamophobic'.

This is how political correctness works. Its defensible wish to defend anything it considers to be a minority spills over very quickly into a wish to defend minorities even from justifiable criticism, as well as the silencing of critics as 'bigots' of one kind or another.

Worse than this, it has led to cover-ups of the most appalling crimes and abuses by minorities. Voter fraud in Tower Hamlets in London was covered up by the authorities because those responsible belonged to an ethnic minority.

On a much worse level, the systematic sexual abuse and rape of hundreds of young teenage girls in British towns like Rotherham and Rochdale, dramatised very recently in the BBC series 'Three Girls', was also covered up because the guilty parties were mainly of Pakistani origin.

This is reminiscent of the cover-ups by the Catholic Church. We cover things up when we don't want our reputations damaged, or the reputations of whatever it is we respect or revere.

Racial and religious minorities, especially Muslims, are currently placed above almost all criticism and anything that might subject these minorities to criticism is covered up and those who would throw a light on abuses are silenced and demonised.

Garda Commissioner Nóirín O'Sullivan this week declared that "we should not link terrorism with any specific religion". This is classic PC-speak, a refusal to look something in the face and call it what it is. The Commissioner spoke the opposite of the truth. The terrorist atrocities carried out in London, Manchester, Paris, Brussels, Berlin etc are linked to a particular religion, namely Islam. All of the terrorists in these cases were acting on behalf of Islam. Are Buddhists or Christians or Hindus terrorising our cities like this?

'Islamophobia' is now considered an even greater sin than anti-Semitism. This is why the targeting of synagogues and Jewish graveyards, and Jews themselves, by Islamist fanatics does not draw the ire it should, nor does the routine and revolting depiction of Jews in the Middle East.

Jews are a vastly smaller minority than Muslims, but despite the Holocaust, and despite the growing number of attacks on Jews in Europe, they are considered to be a less vulnerable minority than Muslims. This, I think, is because of the existence of the state of Israel, which is a far bigger bogeyman for the left than Isil, never mind Hamas or Hezbollah. (How many anti-Isil demonstrations has the left in Ireland ever organised?)

Islam will never be vilified the way Catholicism and Christianity are. The misdeeds of Christians are held against all Christians, and many people are angrier by far at wrongs committed by the Church decades, or even centuries ago than at what is being done today in the name of Islam.

Anything bad that happens in the name of Islam is an 'aberration', a 'perversion' of the faith, not 'true Islam'. The more terrorist attacks are carried out in the name of Islam, the more we are told Islam is a 'religion of peace', and the very name Islam means 'peace', when in fact it means 'submission', as in submission to the will of God.

One commentator this week told us, in effect, to get used to terrorism. Islam wasn't even mentioned in the article.

Ms Smith made her comment about the Church in the context of an exchange in the Dáil about the mother and baby homes. What happened in those places is considered a true manifestation of Catholicism, which is why the Church must be destroyed.

It will be said that these places were run by nuns, who are official representatives of the Church, which is true. But where did Jesus say, 'cast the first stone'? Didn't he tell us not to cast the first stone?

Mother and baby homes existed in Britain, in America, in Social Democratic Sweden where unmarried mothers were also treated appallingly until the 1960s or so. Was this a true expression of social democracy, or an aberration?

In any event, even though it is true that Isil is a perversion of Islam, can the same be said of Saudi Arabia or Iran? These are the leading Sunni and Shia countries respectively and both enforce very harsh versions of Sharia law. Both export radical, violent versions of their respective versions of Islam, as the Soviet Union once exported violent, socialist revolution.

Are Saudi Arabia and Iran 'aberrations' because if they are, then a very great deal of Islam in the present age is an 'aberration'.

The truth is that Islam is in need of reform. Muslims need to tell us whether Sharia law can be reformed in such a way that apostates from Islam, or blasphemers, or adulterers are not subject to the death penalty as they are in some countries.

They must tell us whether Saudi Arabia's attitude to women is an aberration or a true expression of Islam.

Above all, ordinary Muslims must take the lead in stamping out Muslim radicalism. This means not alone stamping out the violence, it also means ensuring that in the Muslim communities of the West, only moderate versions of Islam, compatible with broad Western values, take root and nothing else. Radical Islam is what must be defeated.

Irish Independent

Today's news headlines, directly to your inbox every morning.

Don't Miss