| 5.1°C Dublin

Delaney’s ‘in camera’ application to be heard later this month

Close

Former FAI CEO John Delaney. Photo: David Fitzgerald

Former FAI CEO John Delaney. Photo: David Fitzgerald

Former FAI CEO John Delaney. Photo: David Fitzgerald

Former FAI CEO John Delaney's application to have an action, over the inspection of thousands of documents seized from the FAI, to be held in private will be heard later this month.

The application arises out of Mr Delaney’s concerns that media reports of the court case will result in what he claims is private and legally privileged information entering the public domain.

The 'in camera' application is opposed by several media outlets.

Last week, Paul McGarry SC for Mr Delaney told the court that arising out of the independent person's work, their client is seeking a formal order under the 2014 Companies Act that the hearing be conducted 'in camera' where only the parties involved would be present.

Mr Delaney is concerned that material he claims is covered by Legal Professional Privilege (LPP) and or that is private to him comes before the court, counsel said.

This potential dissemination he said is a matter of enormous concern to him, counsel added.

When the matter returned before Ms Justice Leonie Reynolds today, Mr McGarry said that arising out of discussions some of the urgency that had prompted the in-camera application had eased.

However, the 'in camera' issue would have to be heard at some stage, counsel said.

Ms Justice Reynolds fixed the hearing date of the in-camera application for March 23 next.

The judge also ruled that an additional independent person should be appointed to assist barrister Niall Nolan BI in the examination and review of materials over which claims of legal privilege are made by Mr Delaney.

Daily Digest Newsletter

Get ahead of the day with the morning headlines at 7.30am and Fionnán Sheahan's exclusive take on the day's news every afternoon, with our free daily newsletter.

This field is required

The two independent persons will prepare a report for the court which will aid the judge in determining which of the material is privileged and which is not.

The judge said the additional person, who will be identified later this week, was sought by Mr Nolan in order to speed up the process so it will be concluded by May or June of this year.

The judge however was not prepared to appoint an additional five independent persons to help with the examination of the files, as had been sought by the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE).

The judge said that two persons working together, as suggested by Mr Nolan, would yield a more efficient and coherent report within the timeline envisaged by Mr Nolan.

The examination arises out of the seizure of some 280,000 files by the ODCE in February 2020 as part of its criminal investigation into certain matters at the FAI.

In proceedings brought by the ODCE, the judge has been asked to determine which of the material is covered by legal privilege, and cannot be used by the ODCE as part of its probe.



Most Watched





Privacy