Women could have healthier babies by having more partners
WHEN it comes to having perfect children fidelity isn't all that it's cracked up to be.
According to new research, women could improve the quality of their offspring by mating with multiple partners.
Experts from four universities examined the behaviour of an ancestor of the domestic chicken and found that mating with different males helped females produce offspring that are more resistant to disease.
The findings could be applied to other animals – including humans.
Professor David S Richardson, from the University of East Anglia, said: "Our research has shown the females don't need to choose between males to produce the most healthy offspring.
"Rather, by mating with multiple males, they allow their internal choice mechanism to favour the most genetically different sperm.
"This could be the case in other animals, including humans. However, the practicality of testing this in mammals would be very difficult, and obviously impossible in humans for ethical reasons," he said.
Researchers studied red junglefowl using both natural matings and artificial insemination in a project with the University of Oxford, Stockholm University and Linkoping University.
They claim the effect is down to "cryptic female choice" – where an internal reproductive tract mechanism favours the sperm from males that is most genetically different to them.
By increasing the diversity of particular genes, which help detect and fight infections, female birds can provide their offspring with better disease resistance.
Researchers also claim that signals given off by the male – such as odour – could help the female subconsciously choose the best father.
The findings could be important for animal breeders and conservation projects as they show that allowing multiple matings will produce the most disease resistant and genetically healthy offspring.
"To optimise the quality of offspring produced in breeding programmes, we may need to make sure females mate with multiple males and avoid artificial insemination, which could lead to the genetic health of bred stocks being weaker," Prof Richardson said.
"Many breeding programmes for livestock and conservation use artificial insemination. But our research suggests this may not produce the best quality offspring.
"This is because the effect appears to require the subconscious female assessment of the male by some cue during actual mating," he added.