'Viper' loses his latest appeal over tax bill that has risen to €750,000
Criminal Martin 'The Viper' Foley has lost an appeal to a tax demand over a 1990s income bill which ballooned to more than €750,000 due to interest over his failure to fully discharge the original bill over an 11-year period.
The Court of Appeal (CoA) said he had "no case" and dismissed his appeal. It also said it is well known and a matter of public policy that citizens should pay their taxes in a timely manner.
"(Foley) well knew that he had an unpaid bill for taxes due, he well knew that interest was accruing, he had no basis for believing those taxes would not ultimately be pursued and so it was totally within his power at every stage to stop the interest clock from running and to cap the interest bill," the CoA said.
Ms Justice Marie Baker said Foley is believed to have engaged in criminal activity and "enjoyed substantial gains" from this and "other unknown sources".
Please log in or register with Independent.ie for free access to this article.
He was assessed for total income tax for 1993-94 and 1999-2000 at €218,000 (IR£172,000). He appealed and submitted returns claiming his actual income for the two years was €72,000 and the tax due was just €19,000.
He also paid off a small amount of the demand, which was a requirement of being allowed to appeal.
His appeal was refused and he brought another appeal to the Revenue Appeal Commissioner and also submitted revised returns saying his income for the two years involved was €133,000 and his tax bill should be around €50,000.
He made four further payments which brought down the original tax bill to €178,000. The Appeal Commissioner also rejected his appeal and he did not appeal the matter further to the Circuit Court or bring a High Court challenge as he was entitled to do.
The bill remained unpaid and in 2013 the Criminal Assets Bureau (CAB) sued him for €881,000, including the outstanding €178,000 and nearly €634,000 in interest accrued between 2002, when he made his last appeal, and 2013.
The High Court granted summary judgment for the total bill and he then brought an appeal against that claiming he had been unduly prejudiced by the CAB's 11-year delay in bringing the judgment proceedings.
He claimed he had been "taken by surprise", was left in "an almost impossible situation" and the CAB had failed to explain why it took 11 years to bring the judgment application.
The High Court rejected the challenge and he appealed saying that court had, among other things, erred on the facts and in law and failed to attribute sufficient weight to the CAB's delay in prosecuting the case.
The CAB opposed the appeal.
Yesterday Ms Justice Baker, on behalf of the three-judge appeal court, said there was no basis for any confidence on his part that he would not be pursued for the tax.