Monday 19 August 2019

Trial of fatal car crash driver collapses over jury document

Sarah O'Connell (pictured) is charged with careless driving causing the death of Caitlin Taylor Photo: Don MacMonagle
Sarah O'Connell (pictured) is charged with careless driving causing the death of Caitlin Taylor Photo: Don MacMonagle

Anne Lucey

The trial of a woman accused of careless driving causing the death of a schoolgirl has dramatically collapsed after the jurors received a prosecution document, part of which they should not have seen.

Sarah O'Connell (24) of Sean Moylan Park, Mallow, Co Cork, had pleaded not guilty to the charge of careless driving causing the death of Caitlin Taylor (14) of Gouldshill, Mallow, at Knockeenahone, Scartaglen, on the Cork-Kerry border, on June 15, 2014.

Caitlin Taylor
Caitlin Taylor

Caitlin died when she was thrown from the vehicle when the car left the road.

A post-mortem examination found that Caitlin died immediately as a result of a fractured skull and an upper spinal cord injury.

Yesterday afternoon, trial judge Thomas O'Donnell recalled the jury of five men and seven women.

The judge apologised to them but said he had no choice but to discharge them after an application by the defence.

The prosecution had closed its case, and closing speeches from the prosecution and defence were heard on Wednesday.

Judge O'Donnell charged the jury yesterday morning summing up the evidence and speaking about the distinction between dangerous driving and the lesser charge of driving without due care, which the jury had to deliberate on.

The jurors were handed the prosecution exhibits in the case including statements and a memo of a Garda interview with the accused. They were sent out to begin their deliberations at 11.40am.

After just over an hour of deliberation, at 12.43pm, the jury returned asking for clarification on whether a momentary lapse of concentration could amount to careless driving.

Judge O'Donnell advised them on this and on the case law pertaining to it and told them they were the arbiters of the facts.

The jury were sent to lunch under guard.

After lunch, but before restarting deliberations, the foreman of the jury asked the judge about a prosecution exhibit, a memo of an interview, which he said the jury had received and parts of which had been scribbled out.

The 12 jurors were sent to their room, and after consultation between the legal teams, Senior Counsel Mark Nichols, for the defence, told Judge O'Donnell he was applying for a discharge of the jury.

There was a brief discussion in front of the judge, but in the absence of the jury, about the defence application.

At 2.40pm the jurors were recalled and Judge O'Donnell said he wished to speak to them "in respect of the matter regarding the memo of interview and the parts scribbled out".

"From time to time there's agreement between the defence and the prosecution on matters," the judge said.

It had been agreed that a section of the memo should go out and the jurors had been given the edited document.

Unfortunately, they had also been given an item they should not have, the judge said.

He was referring to the scribbled on or unedited document which had been included also in the exhibits.

"The defence has made an application to discharge the jury," the judge said.

"This has happened and I am sorry about that but there's nothing I can do about it," Judge O'Donnell told them.

He thanked them and excused them from jury service for a period of five years.

The matter has been put back to January 15 at Tralee Circuit Criminal Court to fix a date for a new trial and Ms O' Connell has been remanded on continuing bail.

Irish Independent

Editor's Choice

Also in Irish News