Tuesday 24 April 2018

Report by former Chief Justice supports Graham Dwyer's data retention claims, court told

Graham Dwyer on a rare appearance out of jail in Dublin. Photo: Sunday World
Graham Dwyer on a rare appearance out of jail in Dublin. Photo: Sunday World

Tim Healy

A report by a former Chief Justice John Murray supports Graham Dwyer's claim that Ireland's data retention legislation breaches European laws, the High Court heard.

Remy Farrell SC, for Dwyer, told Mr Justice Tony O'Connor on Wednesday that in a report published last year the retired Chief Justice said that the Communications (Retention of Data) Act 2011 amounts to mass surveillance  of the entire population of the state and was contrary to EU legislation.

Counsel said while the contents of the report, commissioned in 2016 in the wake of allegations journalists records were wrongfully accessed by the Garda Siochana Ombudsman Commission (GSOC), are the opinion of a now retired judge they do tie into Dwyer's complaints about Ireland's indiscriminate data retention regime.

Mr Farrell was speaking on the second day of Dwyer's challenge against the Garda Commissioner and the State aimed at having struck down certain provisions of the law that allow data from mobile phones be used by prosecutors during his trial for the murder of Elaine O'Hara.

The State deny the claims and say that he is not entitled to any of the declarations he seeks.

Dwyer's complaints include that the 2011 Act does not provide for any independent person, such as a judge, to oversee such requests, to limit what is strictly necessary or ensure privacy rights are protected before the material is handed over. 

It would appear the only persons who had oversight of the request in relation to his client was the Gardai themselves, counsel said.

Dwyer claim's that certain provisions of the 2011 Act breach his privacy rights under the European Charter, Irish Constitution and rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.

In 2014 the European Court of Justice found a 2006 EU directive concerning data retention to be invalid. Dwyers claims that the 2011 Act was introduced by the State to give effect to the 2006 directive, and that it also suffers from the same flaws identified by the ECJ.

Evidence gathered under the 2011 Act should not have been used against him in his trial, Dwyer claims.

In 2015 Dwyer was sentenced to life imprisonment after the jury found guilty of the childcare worker's murder.

He denies killing Ms O'Hara,and has challenged provisions of the 2011 Act, which allowed Gardai investigating her death obtains and use mobile phone records during his lengthy trial.

His appeal against his conviction remains pending before the Court of Appeal.

On Wednesday, Mr Justice O'Connor also heard evidence from Dwyer's solicitor,Jonathan Dunphy, concerning his statement supporting his client's challenge.

Questioned by Sean Guerin SC, for the respondents, Mr Dunphy accepted that there were strands other than the retention of mobile phone data that resulted in the Gardai arresting Dwyer in October 2013 

Mr Dunphy accepted that the criminal trial had been told that Dwyer had in interviews with Gardai following his client's arrest had volunteered personal and private information about his family and professional life.

Mr Dunphy agreed that evidence, including oral testimony and text messages removed from other phones about Dwyer's movements and location at certain times as well as the evidence obtained from retained data was used by the prosecution during the trial.

Mr Dunphy accepted neither he nor Dwyer had made a complaint under the provisions on the 2011 Act about the use of the retained data.

However, in reply to Mr Farrell, for Dwyer, Mr Dunphy accepted the complaints mechanism provided for in the 2011 Act was not relevant in regards to the assertion the provisions of the Act  being challenged breaches Dwyer's rights.

The hearing continues.

Online Editors

Today's news headlines, directly to your inbox every morning.

Editor's Choice

Also in Irish News