Robust Bitcoin survives first real test: 'Mt Goxalypse'
WHY does Bitcoin refuse to die? It's a question that many will ask after what seemed like a terminal blow last week: the collapse of the oldest and most famous Bitcoin trading exchange, Mt Gox.
It was a messy business, with €230m of Bitcoin owners' money lost (possibly stolen) when a glitch in the exchange's handling of Bitcoin was apparently exploited by persons unknown.
Howls of 'I told you so' emerged almost immediately, in the main from economists and pundits who have predicted the demise of the virtual currency for the last five years. TV stations from Bloomberg to CNBC to the BBC ran "Bitcoin Crisis" headlines.
One US senator even called for the crypto-currency to be banned. (A verdict from Irish Senator Fidelma 'Some Class Of A Microchip' Healy Eames on the crypto-currency is expected soon.) Yet not only did Bitcoin stabilise in the 48 hours after the Mt Gox meltdown, its price started to rise again. At the time of writing, it was nearing $600, (€434) well up on its post-crash level of $500 (though well down on its pre-crash $950 level).
Why is this? Why are investors and traders ignoring the advice of middle-aged institutional economists and banking middle-men?
There are three main reasons why Bitcoin refuses to die.
1. People that matter believe in it.
If you line up the flag-wavers against the naysayers, it's hard to ignore the comparative make-up of both.
Promoters of the crypto-currency are often doers and creators. They are people like Marc Andreessen or senior web industry business executives: engineers and entrepreneurs who are currently creating a lot more wealth than other industrial sectors. This indicates that when they believe passionately in something, they build things to support it.
By contrast, many of the most vocal sceptics fit the profile of institutionalised vice-presidents with personal and professional capital invested in the status quo. They work for banks, listed investment firms and other financial organisations with nothing to gain – and plenty to lose – if systems like Bitcoin continue to take root in the public consciousness.
A very common reason against Bitcoin given by besuited naysayers is: "I don't understand it." In a world dominated by vague derivatives and CFDs, is this really the clincher argument?
2. Chinese investors like it.
As others have pointed out, the rise in Bitcoin's value was sharpest when China's oldest Bitcoin exchange – BTC China – took on funding. Even though the crypto-currency is banned in China, Chinese investors have poured into Bitcoin.
3. Bitcoin seems to have earned confidence.
One of the key elements to any would-be currency – particularly one that is not backed up by an asset such as gold – is confidence.
In the case of an established currency such as the dollar, that confidence is the sovereign commitment of the government and institutions.
While Bitcoin has nothing approaching that level of depth, its survival of the Mt Gox meltdown is a significant test passed. It signals to potential users and investors that if another such event happens, their virtual worth may not vanish overnight.
To be clear, I do not own any Bitcoin. Nor am I likely to buy any soon (journalists are usually not investor-grade individuals). But I can clearly see a use for Bitcoin: with a little more development, it is a very efficient, frictionless way of transferring money and taking payments.
If I can see this, there are millions of far cleverer people who can also see it. I wouldn't bet on Bitcoin dying anytime soon.
Sunday Indo Business