Monday 22 January 2018

'Savings' sound good on the surface but let's delve a little deeper

Whoever is right about the savings from the Croke Park agreement, it is clear there is a lot of confusion over what the Government means by "savings".

To be non-sexist, it is like the man who came home and said he had "saved" €1,000 by not buying the new golf clubs.

It may be that public spending will be €3.5bn less than if there had been no Croke Park agreement but there is no actual saving whatsoever.

Official forecasts make this clear; all the reductions in the pay bill, from pay cuts and the pension levy, have already taken place.

Very few further reductions are planned or forecast. The pay bill of €18bn this year is meant to fall by €1bn over the next three years but rise by €1bn in the next two.


This is the significance of increments, which cost around €200m a year.

Further redundancies and other Croke Park savings are needed to pay for this each year -- but officially count as "savings".

There is no such ambiguity for taxpayers. Direct taxes are due to rise by €9bn in cash over the next five years, with €5bn coming from income tax.

But even holding the public-sector pay bill steady along side a €9bn rise in taxes is not enough.

The Government must reduce cash spending on goods and services by €2bn, cut "transfers" on things like child benefit by €2bn, and knock another €2bn off capital spending.


The uncomfortable fact is that, over the five years, day-to-day government spending before debt interest will fall by just €2bn, while the deficit must be cut by €11bn.

It is a policy question whether public-sector pay should make a bigger contribution to these extraordinary figures but we should at least be clear on what is meant by "falls" and "savings".

Irish Independent

Promoted Links

Promoted Links

Business Newsletter

Read the leading stories from the world of Business.

Also in Business