Whistleblower's claims 'wholly unreliable' says investigator
The independent investigation into allegations of misconduct within the Banking Inquiry has found there is "no substance whatsoever" for the whistleblower's claims.
Barrister Senan Allen, who carried out the investigation, branded the whistleblower a "wholly unreliable historian" and said their claims were not backed up by documentary evidence supplied to his inquiry.
Mr Allen found none of the inquiry's participants sought "favourable treatment" as was alleged. He said procedures dealing with conflicts of interest were "robust" and were "correctly applied".
In the redacted executive summary of his report, which was published by the Houses of the Oireachtas, Mr Allen also said the staff member accused of leaking evidence had not done so.
He said the detailed report of allegations produced by the whistleblower contained a "good deal of suspicion, surmise and conclusion" but little by way of "hard information".
The barrister said in many cases the claims in the report made by the whistleblower are "plainly at variance" with the documentary evidence he reviewed.
Mr Allen said the confidential informant "could not be brought" to understand the laws underpinning the Banking Inquiry even though they were a "trained lawyer".
"The confidential informant would not, and could not be brought to recognise their place in the Investigation Team and repeatedly asserted a position of seniority as an Investigator which they did not have. The confidential informant refused to recognise the seniority and authority of [Management]," Mr Allen wrote.
He said the whistleblower's view became "so distorted" that they treated any view that was not their own with "suspicion and corruption".
Acting clerk of the Dáil Peter Finnegan welcomed Mr Allen's report and said it will allow the inquiry investigation team to focus on providing a professional service to the Oireachtas committee.
Fianna Fáil Senator Marc MacSharry, who first raised the whistleblower's allegations publicly, welcomed the report but said there was still question to be answered.
The whistleblower released a statement "categorically refuting" Mr Allen's findings and is considering legal action.