Saturday 23 March 2019

Theresa May to meet Juncker in bid to change the backstop

Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May is seen outside of Downing Street before she heads to Northern Ireland, February 5, 2019. REUTERS / Toby Melville
Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May is seen outside of Downing Street before she heads to Northern Ireland, February 5, 2019. REUTERS / Toby Melville

Andrew Woodcock and David Hughes

Theresa May is to travel to Brussels on Thursday for talks with European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, as she seeks changes to the Brexit deal which was rejected by MPs last month.

The British Prime Minister is expected to press the case for the Withdrawal Agreement to be reopened - to replace the backstop with alternative arrangements for avoiding a hard border in Ireland after Brexit.

It is her first formal meeting with senior EU officials, since the deal which she reached with Mr Juncker in November went down to overwhelming defeat in the House of Commons and since MPs voted for the removal of the backstop.

The backstop is effectively an insurance arrangement required by the EU to ensure the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic remains open if no wider deal is agreed on future UK-EU trade.

Later today Mrs May will make a high-profile speech in Northern Ireland, where she will insist that she can secure a House of Commons majority for a Brexit deal that "commands broad support" in the province.

She will say that it is a "concerning time" but "we will find a way to deliver Brexit" that honours commitments to keep the border open.

Mr Juncker is to meet Taoiseach Leo Varadkar on Wednesday.

Also on Wednesday Mrs May will hold talks with Northern Ireland's political leaders including the DUP's Arlene Foster, who has promised to tell the Prime Minister the proposed border backstop "drives a coach and horses through the Belfast Agreement's principle of consent" and would effectively create a new border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

Meanwhile, former first minister Lord Trimble confirmed he is considering a legal challenge to the backstop over concerns it breaches the Good Friday Agreement.

Lord Trimble told BBC Radio 4's 'Today' programme: "We are exploring this possibility and we are concerned at the way in which the Withdrawal Agreement that our Prime Minister agreed actually turns the Belfast Agreement on its head and does serious damage to it."

Announcing Mrs May's planned visit to Brussels, European Commission spokesman Margaritis Schinas said: "As you know, what we have is a procedure involving a number of votes which have taken place in the UK Parliament

"On that basis, the Prime Minister will come along to spell out to us her ideas for what happens next.

(left to right) Iain Duncan Smith and Theresa Villiers arrive at the Cabinet Office in Westminster, London for a meeting of the Alternative Arrangements Working Group (AAWG). Photo: Stefan Rousseau / PA Wire
(left to right) Iain Duncan Smith and Theresa Villiers arrive at the Cabinet Office in Westminster, London for a meeting of the Alternative Arrangements Working Group (AAWG). Photo: Stefan Rousseau / PA Wire

"President Juncker has been in constant contact with her and will look forward to seeing her... to pursue these discussions.

"But we have to repeat what you are aware of, that is that the EU's position, the Commission's position, is clear that we are awaiting once again to see what the Prime Minister has to tell us."

Alternatives

In Westminster, the working group bringing together Tories from both sides of the party was continuing efforts to agree an alternative to the backstop.

A meeting on Monday involving Brexiteers Iain Duncan Smith, Theresa Villiers, Steve Baker and Owen Paterson, along with former Remainers Nicky Morgan and Damian Green, was described as "detailed and constructive" by the UK's Brexit Department.

But Brussels has restated its opposition to any attempt to reopen the Withdrawal Agreement, insisting the backstop was the "only operational solution" to the border question.

Mr Schinas dismissed reports that Commission secretary general Martin Selmayr had made an offer of legally-binding assurances that the backstop would not lock the UK permanently in a customs union after Brexit.

'The Times' reported that Leave-backing MPs from the Commons Brexit Committee rejected the concession during a meeting with Mr Selmayr in Brussels on Monday.

But in a tweet immediately after the meeting, Mr Selmayr himself insisted that "on the EU side, nobody is considering this", adding that the MPs had been "inconclusive" when asked whether any such assurance would help get the Withdrawal Agreement through the Commons.

Mr Schinas said: "What you have read in the secretary general's tweet is exactly what happened."

Conservative MP Stephen Crabb, who was part of the committee delegation, suggested that Mr Selmayr did not make a direct offer during the meeting, but sounded his visitors out over what impact a legally-binding assurance might have on the debate in the UK.

"We talked around the idea of the letter being written into some sort of legal protocol," Mr Crabb told The Times.

"Every time someone asked him if it was something he could do, he said, 'Let me turn around the question, if we were to do that would you be guaranteed to vote for the deal?'

"That's where some of the more Brexiteer members of the committee wouldn't say."

Meanwhile Mrs Foster told the 'Today' programme that Parliament had given Mrs May "a clear mandate to go back to Brussels" and get rid of the backstop.

"Parliament's mandate is to replace the backstop," said the DUP leader.

"The current backstop, as I have said all along, is toxic to those of us living in Northern Ireland, and indeed for unionists right across the United Kingdom, because it would cause the break-up of the United Kingdom into the medium and longer term."

In her speech, Mrs May will promise a solution "that commands broad support across the community in Northern Ireland" and "secures a majority in the Westminster Parliament".

But Tánaiste Simon Coveney said alternatives to the backstop were "wishful thinking".

He said: "The Irish protocol in the Withdrawal Agreement already allows for alternative arrangements or alternative solutions to the backstop and if they're there they can replace the backstop.

"The problem is that none of those ideas around alternative arrangements stand up to scrutiny, we have certainly not seen any that have."

Online Editors

Also in Business