Saturday 15 December 2018

Pressure mounts on minister Denis Naughten amid INM controversy

Mr Naughten is under pressure over claims he tipped off a lobbyist about a decision on a proposed media takeover.

Denis Naughten making a statement on claims around Independent News and Media in the Dail (Oireachtas TV/PA)
Denis Naughten making a statement on claims around Independent News and Media in the Dail (Oireachtas TV/PA)

By Lesley-Anne McKeown, Press Association

Pressure is continuing to mount on Ireland’s communications minister Denis Naughten.

The Taoiseach was again forced to defend his Cabinet colleague over claims he tipped off a lobbyist about a decision on a proposed media takeover.

Answering questions in the Dail, Leo Varadkar said: “Minister Naughten didn’t do any favours for anyone. He didn’t do any favours for Independent News and Media (INM), he didn’t do any favours for Denis O’Brien.

“In fact his action was to delay the merger – delay the proposed merger between INM and Celtic Media by referring it to the Broadcasting Authority.”

ipanews_550ca2b3-9c8e-4acc-9ae7-32420f8ca9f6_embedded234713966
Ireland abortion laws

Last week Mr Naughten made an unscheduled statement to the Dail responding to claims that a PR firm passed details of a telephone call with the minister to a senior figure within INM, two months before his referral to the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) was officially announced.

Mr Varadkar added: “In relation to the phone call with the lobbyist, Mr Naughten indicated that he would follow the law and be guided by official advice and that is of course what any official would do.

“I am not sure if that constitutes confidential information or not but in my mind it doesn’t because that is what ministers will do – they will follow the law and be guided by official advice.

“He has said that he regrets he ever took the phone call. He has said that he regards it as a political mistake on his behalf and he has apologised for it today.”

Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin said he believed a “serious error of judgment” had been made.

He said: “It is clear to me and most people that the minister made a serious error of judgment and his defence to date has been very poor in relation to that very serious error.”

Later, he added: “When you give that commercially sensitive information to one party you are actually responsible for what happens with it down the line because you shouldn’t give it in the first place because by giving it you know there are consequences in giving it.

“I find it difficult that you find it difficult to find the words to say that this was a wrong thing to do.”

Press Association

Today's news headlines, directly to your inbox every morning.

Also in this section