Bomber jury to decide life or death
Published 09/04/2015 | 05:36
The jury which convicted Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev must now decide whether he lives or dies.
Tsarnaev, 21, was found guilty of 30 counts against him, including conspiracy and deadly use of a weapon of mass destruction. Seventeen of those charges are punishable by death.
The verdict was considered practically a foregone conclusion since Tsarnaev's lawyer admitted he participated in the bombings.
The former college student was found responsible for the deaths of three people who died in the bombings as well as the killing of a Massachusetts Institute of Technology police officer who was gunned down days later as Tsarnaev and his now-dead brother Tamerlan attempted to flee.
In addition to the people who were killed, more than 260 others were injured when twin pressure-cooker bombs packed with shrapnel exploded near the marathon's finish line on April 15, 2013, turning the traditionally celebratory home stretch of the world-famous race into a scene of carnage.
The defence lawyers, who barely cross-examined the prosecution's witnesses during the first part of the trial, are expected to become much more aggressive during the penalty phase, when they will make a case that Tsarnaev's life should be spared.
The defence gave a preview of its case during the trial when it insisted that the then 19-year-old Tsarnaev was strongly influenced by his radicalised older brother, who was said to have masterminded the attack.
Tsarnaev's lawyers are expected to continue that theme, but also to explore the brothers' relationship more deeply and perhaps bring in evidence about Tsarnaev's life in Russia and the former Soviet republic of Kyrgyzstan, where the family lived before moving to the US about a decade before the bombings.
The defence can present any mitigating evidence it believes will persuade the jury that life in prison is the appropriate punishment rather than death.
Legal analysts said they do not expect the defence case to contain any new revelations about Tsarnaev.
"The crime is so horrific that they don't have much else really to point to, other than his age and the influence of his older brother," said Dan Collins, a former federal prosecutor who handled the case against a suspect in the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India.
"At this point, it's going to be the life experiences and the perspectives of the jurors in deciding whether or not they believe that these points are strong enough that his life should be spared."
During the penalty phase, which could begin as early as Monday, prosecutors will provide evidence of aggravating factors they believe support the death penalty. They have already listed several aggravating factors, including the killing of a child and the targeting of the marathon because of the potential for maximum bloodshed.
During the trial, prosecutors portrayed Tsarnaev and his brother - ethnic Chechens - as full partners in a plan to punish the US for its wars in Muslim countries. Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, died when he was shot by police and run over by his brother during a chaotic getaway attempt days after the bombing.
Survivors described losing legs in the blasts or watching people die. Martin Richard's father described making the agonising decision to leave his mortally wounded son so he could get help for his six-year-old daughter, whose leg had been blown off. Seventeen people lost limbs in the bombings.
"I think the existence of other victims is an important point the government will emphasise," Mr Collins said. "One of the aggravating factors that exists under the statute is the grave risk of death to additional persons, and showing that this bombing did have a widespread effect on other individuals is going to be one of the things they are going to point to."
The jury must agree unanimously for Tsarnaev to receive a death sentence, otherwise the penalty will be life behind bars.