One of the more persistent absurdities accompanying Roberto Mancini's Champions League misadventures is the idea that suddenly he is going to exclaim "eureka".
And then the mysteries of performing with even a basic adequacy in football's greatest club competition will suddenly dissolve.
Please, is it not time to get a little more serious about the fact that Mancini, barring something quite miraculous, has condemned himself to still another catastrophic European experience?
What is it that a man who has known -- admittedly with resources that most of his rivals would die for -- considerable domestic success in both England and Italy needs to discover about a challenge which on five occasions now has left him so confused?
Surely, it cannot be that there is some extraordinary suspension of the normal rules governing success at any level of football.
It cannot be that Mancini, given all his experience as both a distinguished player and a successful coach, needs a prolonged education in the special demands of a competition which is so self-evidently a natural extension of a winning coach's work.
It was simply a case of more of the same. More drive, more confidence. More tactics geared to the potential of your players and some easily transmittable sense that you have the means to get the job done.
On the night Mancini was once again behaving in Europe as a parody of a coach who seemed to know what he was doing, one apologising for a crime he never began to explain, Jurgen Klopp, coach of the Borussia Dortmund team which so thoroughly outplayed Manchester City at the Etihad Stadium, was reflecting on why it was his team had just brought down Real Madrid.
They had done it with a performance that was resonant with both easy skill and the hardest effort.
The requirement, said Klopp, was an understanding and confidence in the strength of your players and a degree of boldness in taking on any quality of opposition.
It wasn't some blood-stained insight drawn from years of Champions League battling. It wasn't some dogged pursuit of a mislaid chord. It was what you do as a serious contender for one of football's great prizes. You certainly don't criticise your players with the public frequency of Mancini.
You don't dismiss the instincts of players as naturally whole-hearted as Joe Hart and Joleon Lescott -- and especially not after revoking a declaration that Carlos Tevez had gone beyond all reasonable bounds of redemption when he refused to follow orders in a huge match in Munich, then sulked off to South America.
You don't engage in tactical debates over the desirability of three or four at the back, and necessary adaption times, in the wake of a chaotic defeat already guaranteed to drag your credibility as a top coach uncomfortably close to zero.
Yet, still we have this crazed theory that City are not involved in a serious examination of their status as a potentially leading club in Europe but are on some kind of open-ended voyage of discovery.
Many of Mancini's rivals have very good reason to find it hard to believe that anyone enjoying such huge resources should be given such an easy ride of performance assessment at the highest level of the game.
In Milan, Internazionale allowed Mancini three attempts at making some impact on the Champions League. When he failed for a third time to get beyond the quarter-finals, the verdict came in hard and final.
Mancini may feel that, having won the Premier League title -- even if it was by the finest, most hazardous margin despite a squad that was palpably the strongest in the land -- he is entitled to at least as much indulgence from his Abu Dhabi owners.
Perhaps he will get it. Maybe he will continue to operate in the security of a bizarre role as a hugely rewarded student on a European training course. There is, of course, the possibility of another outcome.
It is that somebody in the Middle East will note that the apex of the club's ambition, the European crown for which there has been such giant investment, remains somewhere on the dark side of the moon.
Mancini, meanwhile, has risked stirring further unrest among his players by insisting that those who do not fall into line with his methods have a limited future with the club.
Micah Richards, who suggested his fellow defenders were unhappy with the way City resorted to a back three in the catastrophic defeat to Ajax, was told he could expect to watch from the bench if he did not understand the system.
"If you are a top player, it is not important what system you use," he said. "If you don't understand that, then you are not a top player and you cannot play for a top club." (© Independent News Service)
Manchester City v Swansea,
Live, ESPN, 5.30