Anscombe has no grounds for concern over Sarries’plastic pitch
ULSTER may well have to play on an artificial pitch in their bid to become European champions.
Saracens, coached by ex-Ulster boss Mark McCall, are in discussions with Barnet Council in the hope they will grant the club permission to temporarily extend the ground's capacity from 10,000 to the 15,000 mark, which is required by organisers ERC to stage a quarter-final.
However, Anscombe dismissed any concerns about his side playing on a plastic pitch and stated that Saracens had earned the right to have it on their favoured ground.
"I don't care really," the coach said. "As long as it's a good ground and the conditions are right but look it doesn't matter, they have won the right to have a home game."
Saracens chief executive Edward Griffiths clearly stated that the club were putting their full weight behind staging the game at their new ground.
"This is our home ground now so we'd like to stage the match here. This is absolutely our first choice. We want to try and bring those discussions to a close by the end of next week. We want something agreed as soon as possible," Griffiths said.
If Saracens get the green light, they will then have to submit their proposal to Heineken Cup organisers ERC by February 6 with a final decision having to be made two days later.
ERC have the ultimate say on where the game will be played. Ulster will not have any say in the final choice of ground, though clearly they may feel somewhat disadvantaged by the surface and will need to address that issue if Allianz Park is approved.
The first game at the ground is due to take place on Sunday when Saracens host Cardiff in the LV Cup and the official opening of the ground takes place on February 16 when Exeter are the visitors for a Premiership clash.
Allianz Park is the first artificial pitch which has been designed for professional rugby and though studies carried out in American Football, where 14 NFL teams use similar surfaces, show a marginally lower rate of injury there is no existing analysis on the impact it might have on rugby.