GAA must be cautious after reaching for Sky
Satellite broadcaster unlikely to settle for bit part as public becomes dependent on output
Published 02/04/2014 | 02:30
So, BSkyB come riding into town with their neon lights and their bottomless wallets and the potential is limitless. The Irish on foreign shores. The benefits to the coaching structures. The increased professionalism TV demands. Shaking up the RTE monopoly. Extra expenses for players. Tactics explained. More games shown. People paying, as they should, to watch the things they want to watch.
My lazy head that thinks at times in terms of success in our society, of the bottom line, of all things shiny.
However, when I really think about these first, tentative steps by BSkyB, they don't sit so well.
Now it's hardly MacMurrough inviting Strongbow to set up shop, but there's a danger there when I think about the direction in which these things can go.
BSkyB need to mine smaller markets, given BT's investment in soccer and now rugby. So, will they be happy to just dip in their toes? Maybe, on this contract, throw a few million into the pot for RTE's scraps.
Players are already at breaking point in terms of the time they commit to hurling and football. The man who demands that commitment is, more often than not, getting paid.
Is it any wonder that as soon as Sky are mentioned, payment for players isn't far behind. This isn't about pay-for-play, though. It's about dependency. Whatever the viewers financially commit to, on the basis of Sky's involvement, strengthens the broadcaster's hand at the negotiating table and it makes the public more dependent on their output.
What will Sky do when we become dependent? Allow us to continue our games as they are – totally unimpeded?
This, for the GAA, is a small part of greater plan to develop foreign markets and to cater for the swathes of players that have left Ireland over the past six years. So we need to widen exposure and we use Sky to do that. So they obediently help us for comparably little in return?
I'm not sure that fits with BSkyB's business model.
Decisions like these don't work on straight-up questions in newspapers about what you value and what you don't. They happen behind closed doors and in dark corridors. Where voices of reason can often be locked outside.
Cynical, for sure. But as a 32-year-old in Ireland I seem to have developed a natural lean towards distrust when it comes to institutional decision-making on issues that are important for our cultural development.
The head and the heart.
Only one for sale.