Wednesday 28 June 2017

Deaf well able to serve on juries

We refer to your report of July 15 on the recent court ruling that deemed Joan Clarke, a deaf mother of two, eligible for the jury service but refused admission for the sign-language interpreter to the jury room.

We applaud the judge's ruling for removing some barriers for deaf people to serve on the juries. We applaud Ms Clarke for taking a stand in the first place. But there is a troublesome issue arising from this ruling.

The widely held belief, as identified in the article, is that the purpose of employing an interpreter is to assist the deaf person.

Please sign in or register with for free access to Opinions.

Sign In

Don't Miss