The academics who took 'fake' into new orbit
'The androcentric scientific and meta-scientific evidence that the penis is the male reproductive organ is considered overwhelming and largely uncontroversial."
Yes, I've been boning up (as it were) on some light reading lately, and my interest was piqued by the latest peer reviewed piece of academia which appeared in the journal Cogent Social Science (buy early to avoid disappointment. Copies are selling fast!).
Co-authored by academics Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, their pioneering study was called 'The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct' and, among other things, blamed men's members on climate change, arguing that: "Toxic hyper-masculinity derives its significance directly from the conceptual penis and applies itself to supporting neocapitalist materialism, which is a fundamental driver of climate change, especially in the rampant use of carbon-emitting fossil-fuel technologies and careless domination of virgin natural environment."