Save the lions, yes, but starving children are more important
Published 03/08/2015 | 02:30
His kid is sitting in the front seat. The little boy is maybe eight or nine.The child is smoking 20 a day, passively.
Only it's not passive. The studies all show that kids suffer terribly from the aggressive effects of smoke on their bodies. The expression 'passive smoking' should be deemed as unfit for purpose and banned as being a misrepresentation.
Passive sounds almost as if there's no real sense of actually doing anything wrong. Yet we are all passive killers in one way or another,