Tuesday 17 October 2017

Rich should not be different when it comes to debts

If Nama is to retain any credibility, it must take tough action on cynical transferring of assets, writes Celia Larkin

IWAS reading about the controversy surrounding the transfer to their wives of assets by some developers in Nama and I thought, "damn it, I should have got married". Then at least I could be guaranteed of holding on to any assets while walking away from the debts incurred in my little shop. You may remember I had to close the business last summer.

My debts are piddly little things compared to the billions we've heard discussed but if I don't continue to pay them, I risk losing my home. I'm single, you see, so I can't transfer my assets into the hubby's name.

I'm not complaining. The way I look at it, I took the risk with the business and I'll take the hit. After all, if I had made millions (not very likely with a couple of beauty salons but you get my meaning) I'd be quite happy to keep the profits. So I figure that when I lost, I had to be prepared to pay up.

Please sign in or register with Independent.ie for free access to Opinions.

Sign In

Independent.ie Comments Facility

INM has taken the decision to remove the commenting facility on its online platform Independent.ie to minimise the legal risk to our business that arises from Ireland's draconian libel awards system.

We continue to look forward to receiving comments through direct email contact or via social media, some of which may still be featured on the website Independent.ie


Don't Miss