Vitamins do more harm than good for cancer sufferers
Published 09/01/2013 | 05:00
Late-stage cancer patients could be thwarting their own treatment by taking multivitamin pills containing antioxidants, the Nobel Prize -winning scientist James Watson has warned.
The benefits of supplements containing antioxidants such as vitamins A, C and E are the subject of fierce debate. While some studies suggest that they could offer moderate protection against cancer, Prof Watson, who with Francis Crick discovered the "double helix" structure of DNA in 1953, argues that the pills could be doing more harm than good.
In a new paper, he claims that the reason late stage cancers often become untreatable is that they produce high levels of antioxidants which stop treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy from working. In healthy people, antioxidants can be helpful because they attack molecules known as "free radicals" which can damage DNA. But many cancer treatments use free radicals to kill tumour cells, meaning antioxidants could prevent them doing their job.
Prof Watson said studies should be carried out to test his theory which he described as "among my most important work since the double helix".
Writing in the Royal Society's 'Open Biology journal', he said: "For as long as I have been focused on the understanding and curing [of] cancer, well-intentioned individuals have been consuming antioxidative nutritional supplements as cancer preventatives if not actual therapies.
"In light of the recent data strongly hinting that much of late-stage cancer's untreatability may arise from its possession of too many antioxidants, the time has come to seriously ask whether antioxidant use much more likely causes, than prevents, cancer.
"Blueberries [ high in antioxidants] had best be eaten because they taste good, not because their consumption will lead to less cancer."
Professor Nic Jones, Cancer Research UK's chief scientist, said: "We know from many large studies that, far from being potent cancer-fighters, antioxidant supplements seem to be ineffective for cancer prevention in healthy people, and some can even slightly increase the risk of cancer. This should give people good reason to think twice about relying on them."
Meanwhile a separate health survey has concluded that genes are largely to blame for bulging waistlines, a study has found.
While diet plays a key role in obesity, some people are programmed to get fat easily, research from the US suggests.
Although the work focused on mice, it is believed to be just as relevant to humans.
Lead scientist Dr Brian Parks, from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), said: "Our research demonstrates that body-fat responses to high-fat, high-sugar diets have a very strong genetic component, and we have identified several genetic factors potentially regulating these responses.
Dramatic increases in obesity over the past few decades have been linked to high-calorie sugar and fat-rich diets as well as sedentary "couch potato" lifestyles. But the new research indicates that body-fat responses to food are to a large extent hard-wired in to our DNA. (© Daily Telegraph, London)