Michelle Morrison 'has decided she does not wish to proceed with her claim,' High Court hears
MICHELLE Morrison's High Court case over sea views and privacy from her Dalkey home is no longer proceeding, a judge was told today.
The case was due to enter its 5th day today when her counsel Mark Sanfey said his client had "considered the matter over the weekend and decided she does not wish to proceed with her claim".
Mr Justice David Keane said on the basis he was told the matter was being withdrawn, he was dismissing the case.
Over the weekend also, singer Van Morrison, who was married to Ms Morrison, issued a statement dissociating himself from the legal action and said he had never lived in Kilross House, Sorrento Road, Dalkey.
He said the court action “was brought by Michelle Rocca and I have no part in it.
"As we have been legally separated since September 2013 I would appreciate if I was not included in any further references to this ongoing action.”
Ms Morrison told the court last Friday that Van initially thought about using Kilross as a recording studio but later "we decided it would be a family home".
She said privacy was an important consideration for Van who liked to be able to get out of his car and go to his front door without being overlooked. Views of Dalkey Island from Kilross were also important for her, she said.
It was Ms Morrison's second action over work by neighbours Conor and Eileen Kavanagh on their "Mount Alverno" home. The previous one, brought against the local council in relation to compliance with planning permission, was settled.
Esmonde Keane SC, for the Kavanaghs, asked the court to "mark its opprobrium" over what was a vexatious and unstateable case by awarding costs beyond the normal so that his clients would recover the actual costs there had been in defending the case.
Their enjoyment of their principal private residence had been "utterly tarnished" and their lives had been made "a living hell" for the last six years during which it was abundantly clear there was no basis for the claim, counsel said.
The evidence which had been heard during the four days of the case showed no support for her claim there was an agreement the sea views would be preserved.
Ms Morrison had "played ducks and drakes" with the court and with the Kavanaghs where following failed mediation she changed solicitors and then sought an adjournment of the case.
Even though the Kavanaghs had not been given any opportunity to respond, as the case was not going on, Mr Morrison's evidence has been "palpably incorrect" and the court should mark its disapproval of her conduct particularly as the Kavanaghs had been "dragged through the courts".
Mr Sanfey SC, for Ms Morrison, said his client fully accepted she was go to have to pay legals costs but because she was not proceeding, the court should not infer the case was falling apart or was frivolous, vexatious and unstateable in the first place.
It was the Morrison side which wanted the matter to go to mediation after the judge urged the parties sto do so on the first day of the case but the Kavanaghs did not want to, counsel said.
What the defendants' counsel wanted to do "was punish the plaintiff (Morrison) for saving the court time", Mr Sanfey said.
Life had "not been a picnic" for either the Morrisons or the Kavanaghs who had a very public falling out between them not just in this case but in the previous case.
He asked the court to award only normal costs.
Mr Justice Keane said he wanted to carefully consider the issue of costs and would give a decision later. He dismissed the case on the basis it had been withdrawn.