Facebook at centre of bitter row over father's 'crude' web posts
Facebook has found itself at the centre of a family legal dispute after a father claimed posting allegedly "crude"images on his Facebook page does not affect his young son.
The father told the Family Court that his posts did not affect his son as the boy had no access to the social media site.
The separated father explained that he was previously allowed to look after his toddler son for five hours, twice a week.
Since January the mother has only allowed him to see their son for two hours at a time.
A lawyer for the child's mother said that the man posted images of his son playing near a second storey windowsill on Facebook.
He described as "crude" other images posted on the man's Facebook page.
The lawyer said these images caused his client to be concerned for her child's safety.
The father insisted he was allowed to post photos on Facebook as he saw fit.
"I don't think anything I do on Facebook has anything to do with my child, considering he doesn't have access to Facebook," he said.
"If I do something crude on Facebook, I don't see how it's relevant to my child. I don't swear around my child. I don't let my child do inappropriate things."
The father told the Family Court that he was evicted from his shared accommodation in January and was living with his current partner and her family.
The father admitted he did not give the mother his current address until she requested it.
He said he had not thought it was important to tell her about his new address for when their son visits, as the visits were only for a few hours.
"Why would I have to tell her everything? I don't see how it makes a difference," he said.
Judge Ann Ryan ordered that access visits between the father and son should take place at the address he has now provided to the mother.