Barclays boosts its bonuses for bankers but axes 12,000 jobs
BRITISH banking giant Barclays said it would axe up to 12,000 jobs this year even as it raised bonuses for investment bankers, prompting fury among politicians and unions who said it had not learned the lessons of the financial crisis.
Britain's third-biggest bank said up to 9pc of employees could go, including 7,000 in Britain, as it tries to lower costs. The cuts are not concentrated in any one business area.
It said it paid £2.4bn (e2.9bn) in incentive awards last year, raising bonuses at the investment bank by 13pc despite a slump in its profits. The average bonus for the investment bank's 26,200 staff was £60,100.
Critics of the bonus hike said it showed Britain's biggest banks were still failing to heed the lessons of a financial crisis caused by dangerous risk taking and excessive pay.
"Today Barclays has stuck two fingers up to hard-pressed families across Britain by announcing another multi-billion pound bonus pool," said Frances O'Grady, General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress.
Barclays Chief Executive Anthony Jenkins, pictured, who took the helm in 2012 after an interest rate rigging scandal, has vowed to improve culture and standards at the bank while also reducing risk and strengthening the balance sheet.
But its investment bank profits slumped 37pc last year to £2.5bn and analysts voiced concern about whether Jenkins can reach his target of a return on equity above 11.5pc by 2016.
Getting costs down looked more challenging than expected, they said, while increased regulatory pressure and a grim outlook for fixed-income revenue made the target on returns look difficult to achieve.
Barclays shares were down 5pc at 261p by 7.55 a.m. ET, underperforming a 0.7pc rise by an index of European banks.
The higher bonuses lifted the compensation to-income ratio in the investment bank to 43.2pc last year from 40pc in 2012. Jenkins, who gave up his own bonus for 2013, said he still aimed for a ratio in the "mid-30s" across the bank.
He defended the bigger bonus pot, saying the bank had to recruit the best staff to compete with global rivals and continued to have "constructive" talks with investors over pay.
"We need to recruit people from Singapore to San Francisco. We need the best people in the bank to drive long-term sustainable returns for our shareholders," Jenkins told reporters on a conference call.
"I understand that there will be some who feel that this decision is the wrong one for Barclays. But it is the decision of the board and myself that this is entirely the right decision for the group and in the long-term interests of shareholders," he said.
But business leaders' group the Institute of Directors said the bank's bonus policy raised the question of whether it was being run for its shareholders, or its staff.
"It cannot be right in any business for the executive bonus pool to be nearly three times bigger than the total dividend payout to the company's owners," said Roger Barker, the institute's director of corporate governance.